Cellphones
There is hot topic to debate, some supporters believe that parents should gift a cellphone to their children, while others think that cell phone is probably detrimental for them. Parents should definitely refrain their kids from using cellphone for two main reasons they are distracting and harmful for the body.
Cellphones are known to ruin creativity of tender growing brain. Psychologist predicted that students who do not use cellphone are proved to be erudite, then students who are clinger to it. For instance, one of my friends made a blunder of providing cellphone to his seven-year-old son. Even though his parents suggested him to use it in leisure time, he misused that opportunity by using it all day even in the school. However, he wasted his precious time and energy by playing games and watching videos, and he failed to set priority. As a consequence, he subsequently failed in all terminal examinations and his creative skills were seriously affected. Hence, he when he grown up he realized that his life might have been completely different if he would not have addicted to cell phone. So, wise parents should restrict use of smart phones.
Exposure to dangerous radiations from smart phones is not uncommon. In fact, children are more susceptible to be affected, it is scientifically proved chances of suffering from brain tumors is three times more in children who use cellphone more eight hours in a day for greater than three years. So, use of technology by children for long time possibly causes irreversible outcomes to health. Parents should be aware from benefits and drawback of smart phone and then decide whether it is logical to provide cellphone to children. Hence, my point is supported by the above explanation.
Flipping to other side of the coin, using Internet from smartphone can provide valuable websites and programs thereby enhancing children’s knowledge and adroit. Furthermore, access to Internet aids kids to solve homework assignments efficiently. However, notorious kids have tendency to open up website which is not suitable for the growing brain. So, there is no doubt in that access to Internet can do more harm than good.
In conclusion, it is worth saying that parents should certainly avoid their children from cellphone for two main reasons first it diminishes nurturing of mind and other it is evidenced to cause catastrophic effect on health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-17 | adejoke | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | chuehweihuan | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Christine hanna | 83 | view |
| 2018-05-30 | miyamoto | 90 | view |
| 2018-02-07 | Taniazehra | 90 | view |
- TPO 39 integrated essay 3
- People learn in different ways. Some people learn by doing things, other people learn by reading about things, others learn by listening to people talk about things.Which of these methods of learning is best for you? Use specific examples to support your 81
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 78
- Which do you think is better for the environment to build fewer factories or to create more wildlife preservation areas 66
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...are proved to be erudite, then students who are clinger to it. For instance, one of my ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16581632653 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82091532218 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9902796481 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202720055827 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697618408294 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901124218866 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124914215171 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066353568051 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.