There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it?
Nowadays, new inventions have become a long-running dispute among the people all over the world, which leads to a moot question “which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life?”. It is a widely held view that the Internet as a new invention is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that the Internet as a new invention plays a vital role in the fast-changing world. Therefore, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that the online technology has made life so convenient and people are able to have a video conference across the world as well as purchase their basic needs online. Secondly, it can be argued that these days an extensive range of medical treatments, such as remote surgery is being performed by the Internet without physical presence. In addition to this information, a group of scientists, working at a prestigious university conducted that cyber technology and simulating processes can be carried out simply in the computer.
However, there is no doubt that using the Internet provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that the Internet comprising a lot of unpleasant programs as well as it can be a root of many crimes and violence that leads to damaging consequences in the community. Moreover, it is quite clear that this technology has made people became more likely isolated and introvert as well as the community has become more sedentary.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that the Internet as a new invention to promote public awareness must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-29 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
2018-10-25 | brandnewiman | 77 | view |
2018-04-26 | masi1397 | 11 | view |
2018-04-15 | ptaher | 85 | view |
2018-04-15 | ptaher | 11 | view |
- do you agree with Getting married before finishing studies 77
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons. 88
- Do you agree with involving employees in decision making process? 77
- Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars be restricted to one for one family? Give your views and support your views with appropriate examples. 85
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
Nowadays, new inventions have become a long-running dispute among the people all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...widely held view that the Internet as a new invention is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
... a common belief that the Internet as a new invention plays a vital role in the fast-changing...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...I firmly believe that the Internet as a new invention to promote public awareness must be tak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, in addition, no doubt, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 312.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07371794872 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94323451969 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586538461538 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.0641478882 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.916666667 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.25397266985 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218525773003 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659512151324 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123015481153 0.071462118173 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131943944608 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144539290257 0.0609392437508 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.