There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it?
Recently, the invention of cell phones has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what is the most important invention in our day-to-day life and its consequences?” Whereas it is a widely held that smartphones are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economic standpoint, cellphones are bound up inextricably with today’s modern lifestyle, which indicates they lead to sufficient use of both money and time. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between high-tech gadgets, and economic growth as well as an exponential increase in people’s wellbeing. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of smartphones is correlated positively with not only economic progression but also improving individuals welfare.
Within the realm of psychological science, without the slightest doubt, smartphones attribute to cyber crimes, in that it would come down to bullying, cheating, and children pornography. A salient example of such attribution is people’s isolation, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take depression for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint behavioral problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of mobile phones.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes " all's well that end's well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that smartphones are of high importance. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive that the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2018-10-25 | brandnewiman | 77 | view |
| 2018-04-26 | masi1397 | 11 | view |
| 2018-04-15 | ptaher | 85 | view |
| 2018-04-15 | ptaher | 11 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support or not? 88
- Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women.'To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 77
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree.Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ing goes ' alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79422382671 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37742948654 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693140794224 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.415429878 50.4703680194 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132690517813 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330328220416 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738346505056 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087278392258 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107842436524 0.0609392437508 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.94827586207 211% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.