Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not.
Recently, the phenomenon of doing dangerous sports and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that vigorous sport is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am not inclined to support dangerous sports such as bungee jumping and I will discuss the reasons throughout this essay.
From the financial standpoint, lucrative sports with high excitement emerged for tourists' attraction and financial profits. It means nobody cares how harmful it would be to body functions. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic examination which discovered the countries that support adventurous sports were visited by young travellers in extremely great numbers rather than those which not support. Thus, the beneficial consequences of tourists and flux of money apparently can be seen.
Secondly, the most important reason for refusing such risk-taking sports is mental features. However, many believe that such these sports develop actor's self-confidence; I think it is as similar to performance-enhancing-drug and provide a type of sports addiction to its actors. As a tangible example, a scientific research is undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of dangerous sports are correlated negatively with the rate of adrenalin aroused in blood. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of sports addiction would occur.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on dangerous activities, I profoundly believe that gentle sports have significant impacts on human kind's health and delightfulness. Dangerous sports not only are harmful to body, but also make adrenaline addiction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-30 | Mpaul | 70 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Simranjot7087 | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | mizomz123 | 55 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | rayudurp | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-21 | jaideep singh | 88 | view |
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons impacts. 11
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- Do you think the design of building affects positively or negatively where people live and work? 85
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of timeDiscuss both sides and give your opinion 67
- You are given climate as the field of study. Which area will you prefer? Explain why you picked up the particular area for your study? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'scientific research'.
Suggestion: scientific research
...n to its actors. As a tangible example, a scientific research is undertaken by a prestigious universi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kinds'' or 'kind's'?
Suggestion: kinds'; kind's
...ports have significant impacts on human kinds health and delightfulness. Dangerous sp...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7276119403 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3617456501 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649253731343 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7721498802 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.076923077 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0780873125479 0.242375264174 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0282465117562 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377078777003 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0516005209467 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246304370799 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.