Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today, there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. Do you agree or disagree?
In the modern world, with the rapid development of technology, people hold different views about whether modern learning should be done in traditional schools or online. I totally disagree with the idea that people should replace the old teaching method with online programs for the following reasons.
First of all, It is true that learners need directly talking with lectures to help them remember and fully understand learning material. In a traditional school, students have the opportunity to ask and get answers almost immediately from their teachers. Furthermore, individuals tend to absorb not only academic knowledge but also moral lessons such as politeness, honesty, respect toward older people in educational institutions, which may be difficult to transmit through the Internet. In contrast, students obtaining knowledge through the Internet might not deeply understand these lessons. This is because these ones seem to hardly receive immediate feedback from their teachers via online and sometimes, the network has problems lead to difficult to communicate each other.
Secondly, the other outstanding benefit of classroom learning is that it creates a motivation for learners. In a big class, students are surrounded by other students who also want to score higher grades. This encourages them to work harder and perform better than self – study on the Internet. On the contrary, students follow online courses might lack motivation and supervision to watch the online lectures and fully prepared for the final exam. For example, Udemy, the online learning company, found that only 12% people who purchased their online courses actually watched all the videos and completed the online tasks.
In conclusion, although online learning has their own advantages, I strongly disagree the idea that people should replace the formal teaching method with online programs because they do not allow face-to-face communication and destroy the motivation of students in their education path.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-30 | Sabesan | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | eppa akhil | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | eppa akhil | 73 | view |
| 2018-03-13 | phuongmeooo | 89 | view |
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today, there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- You were going to meet Liz, one of your international friends. Unfortunately, your plan have changed and you will not be able to meet at the arranged time. Write an email to inform her that you can not meet on the date, give the reasons and suggest a new 70
- Some people think that the Internet has brought people closer together while others think that people and communities are becoming more isolated. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 56
- Some people believe that time spent on computer games can be valuable for children. Others believe this has negative effects on a child. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'these' instead.
Suggestion: these
...derstand these lessons. This is because these ones seem to hardly receive immediate feedba...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to company'
Suggestion: to company
...For example, Udemy, the online learning company, found that only 12% people who purchas...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58360655738 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72920837225 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0797163022 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5384615385 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142054770627 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517704330089 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456504008032 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974519381706 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530672891742 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.