Should government build more roads to allow
more vehicle owner or improve the network of public
transport?
One of the most increasing problem in today's world is increasing in the number of vehicles on the roads. The importance of do government should build more roads or improve the public transportation was always a debatable topic. Many people believe that government should build more roads to accommodate more vehicles. Others reject this notion and claim that improving public transport is the only solution. In my opinion, latter proposition appears to be more rational. The following essay would further elaborate both side with examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, critics believe that possessing one's vehicle is the citizen choice and government should take appropriate actions to provide the space for cars on the roads. For example, in Sydney the number of vehicles increased from 20% to 60 % in last decade, so, therefore the number of roads increased exponentially.
On the other hand, there is a debate of arguments in favor of my stand. The most important one is that public transport is the only way to keep the traffic congestion in control. Not only can improve the public transport reduce the traffic jams and but can also decrease the environment damage caused by the increased cars. Improving public transportation can help people from all different classes including lower to upper middle class. For example, take newly build metro train route in India according to the ABC news: it reduced the traffic congestion up to 10 percent in the area.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that the benefits of strengthening transportation infrastructure are indeed too good to ignore and further the government has to take step to improve public modes of transport which not only reduces traffic but also decrease the global warming.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | nganvuong | 55 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | jashan randhawa | 77 | view |
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Experimental learning or traditional learning in high school and university Which one do you agree is more effective 74
- causes of Global warming? 77
- Education is important as it teach ethics and life value as it teaches us practical things for future employment What is your opinion 81
- Put the examination at the end of the semester or separated small tests throughout the entire semester, which one do you agree? 65
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...n with, critics believe that possessing ones vehicle is the citizen choice and gover...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19047619048 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86555187221 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8058553169 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223760381988 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841990039272 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106375740284 0.071462118173 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138457272235 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108604602653 0.0609392437508 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.