More and more people are moving away from agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work. What will be the consequence of this? what solutions can you offer?.
The importance of agriculture which was debatable has become more controversial. The sutancial influence of people changing their living preference and moving away from agricultural area for employment has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend in society in recent years. It can be said, large number of people moving to cities have caused over populated urban areas and raised various issues. This essay will elaborate how over population in causing strain on urban areas and solution to overcome and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reason why large number of people moving to cities have caused pressure on city infrastructure, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that, over population can result in vast numbers of problems. Example for instance, pollution, high renting and housing price, food availability, lack of employment, overcrowded transportation. people moving away from agricultural background to find employment can have adverse impact on society.
Another reason why people moving from farming background to cities must be analysed to solve the employment availability issue in countryside proper regulation and planning can be implemented to minimise the migration of people from rural area to urban, and thus will result in reducing strain in urban cities. For instance, regional government can build schools, promote local tourism, which will create jobs, supply farmers with morden equipments to do agriculture to sustain living coast. Based on that it can be agreed better facilities in migration to cities can be controlled if there is were enough collaboration.
To conclude approaches to deal with problems of people leaving framing background and moving to cities are numerous, but the most effective one is that, proper facilities in rural areas can help people stay back, which is not impractical and unattainable but comprehensible and feasible.
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 77
- what is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explain why? 80
- Global climate change. who should take responsibility to avoid climate change from government, corporate and individual discuss. 77
- Illiterate of future would not be one who does not know to read, but people who do not know how to learn. 55
- Many people think regions affect successful persons. What is your opinion about native regions and accomplished people influence on the regions they belong to? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The importance of agriculture which was debatable has become more cont...
^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...employment, overcrowded transportation. people moving away from agricultural backgroun...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: IS_WERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where'?
Suggestion: where
...to cities can be controlled if there is were enough collaboration. To conclude a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...to cities can be controlled if there is were enough collaboration. To conclude a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 302.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49668874172 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94594816439 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559602649007 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.8151741519 50.4703680194 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.909090909 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4545454545 20.9669160288 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 7.25397266985 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321238911101 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126054883301 0.0925447433944 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514959052747 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19284244466 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489906036446 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.