Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.
Study vs employment is a hotly-debated topic that often divide opinion. As per this saying that is, First Learn then Remove "L" , it is clear that before earning we must learn the work, task or specific technology. Where a significant amount of people think that it is not possible to combine study and employment while others think study and employment distract each another. This essay will discuss about later points.
First of all its worth considering that If a person will focus on lots of tasks at a single time so he/she would not be perfect in any task. As we are in booming technology era, everyday we are watching new or upgraded inventions. For example if a student will start work side by side study and earn some amount, so student wants to upgrade or buy those things which fascinate him/her rather than take some extra coaching which can make him/her a successful person. So rather than keep focusing on study, person will distract from what will be good for him/her in long run.
On the other hand it have been seen, that due to some financial crisis or family issue, some student start working while studying. We can see similar kind of culture in developed countries where students do part time jobs and earn some amount to fulfill their needs. But problems should be different from need.
To sum up, study and employment both are different branches of same tree but still depends upon priority. As per my opinion, job and study should not start on the early stages of study. We should have enough knowledge to judge what is good or bad for us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Mohammad1364 | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | namdevjd1 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | njerime | 72 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | shivek | 11 | view |
- Ways of communication were different 10 years back. How have this changed over the period? What are the pros and cons of these changes? 77
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888 By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use To what ex 84
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- As the cities are expansing, governments should build more roads, or improve public transportation, and personal vehicle ownership 77
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one's career. To what extent do yo agree or disagree? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... saying that is, First Learn then Remove apos;L apos; , it is clear that before e...
^^
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s, First Learn then Remove apos;L apos; , it is clear that before earning we must...
^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...er in long run. On the other hand it have been seen, that due to some financial c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...n developed countries where students do part time jobs and earn some amount to fulfill th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, then, while, for example, kind of, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58657243816 5.00649968141 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25236546071 2.71678728327 83% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621908127208 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2453673365 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7142857143 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187595182435 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646916432597 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695858299021 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113174282077 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688221374796 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.1260098522 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.5310837438 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.