In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land, therefore, they should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
With the rise in modernization, a man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from walking barefooted in the jungles to take first step on the moon. Nevertheless, there are some issues which remains irrevocable and as complex as ever. For instance, the given topic asserts that should the use of polythene bags be restricted to curb the problem of pollution related to waste material on land and water bodies? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of this topic with illustration and examples and shape my opinion by the end.
It is common assertion that plastic bags are non-biodegradable material. As a result, responsible for arising obstacles related to pollution. A good illustration of this is, in present scenerio, many countries utilise polythene bags to carry goods such as, clothes, vegetables or fruits. Therefore, after consuming eatables they discard them mainy on land or water. Consequently, responsible for producing soil as well as water pollution. Moreover, in homes massive amount of plastic products are used. the best epitome of this is the use of plastic containers for storage. As they are not decomposed related to cause pollution.
Contrary to this, there is an opposing group of people who believe that plastic bags are not only the material causing water and soil pollution. There are plethora of other factors which produce it. Primary one is, releasing of chemical fertilizers for example, pesticides, insecticides are also responsible for polluting land and water bodies.
Nevertheless, weighing both the options, I pen down saying that there is no single conclusion. Still, I make this ground that an effective clap requires both use of hands. Nodoubt, plastic bags are non-biodegradable cause pollution. But, there are voluminous factors which create pollution of land and water. So, this obstacle will be overcome by creating the awareness among the people regarding the bad impact of using plastic bags on natural resources. Therefore, I personally reckon that this problem will be overcome by the method I mentioned above not only by banned them.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 73
- The people think that the government should invest money in arts and cultural events, while others believe that government should spend money on more important things.discuss both side of view and give your opinion. 67
- Many people say that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects equally. Others however, believe that students should spend more time on subjects they like, or are good at. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- Numbers of plants and animals are declining. Describe the reasons and possible solution. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e amount of plastic products are used. the best epitome of this is the use of plas...
^^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... use of plastic containers for storage. As they are not decomposed related to caus...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.353115727 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98191385944 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566765578635 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5237378441 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3181818182 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180941779836 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510205285179 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489589740839 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110197011037 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311103592027 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.