The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Our world change everyday, there is no doubt that human must change to fit with society situation. Some people older belive that human should live by traditional way, live traditional, think and behave traditional but other younger think we should live by traditional way. So, human who is in traditional life should live traditional or modern, that is a difficult question.
It is so easy to realize that traditional way to live have benefit for our life. Firstly, people who live by traditional way usually are principled and orderly. Almost all people live by traditional way have principles for themselves, they will do it, get target. Secondly, people who live by traditional way are respected by another person. They are person who can do things they say and they are strict and careful in their work. But we can not deny that live in traditional way have positive things. To begin with character of people live by traditional way, some of them are outdated, this make they hard to absorb new infomation. Next, some of them who are patriarchal make they hard to contact with another person. Live by tradional way is good but it is not perfect.
Beside live by tradional way, i must admit that live by modern way is fit with changes of world. First, peolple who live by tradinal way have open-minded, they alway keep an open mind to realize changes of social and keep pace with new information, new trend. Second, they are so creative and lookback their fault to fix it. They are people who have receptive new thing help develop themselves. I can not deny that live by modern way still have positive things, Some of them have very open minds so sometimes they lose the politeness in expressing themselves to make others uncomfortable. Not only that, live by modern way is not lost good tradions, we must keep and deserve good tradition of nation. We must broaden the mind to absorb new thing.
Conclusion, with my opinion I think we should live in both ways, combining them to have the most appropriate way of living. These two types of life can not be separated because they all have their own advantages and disadvantages.
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 61
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- The graph below shows average yearly rainfall in Moscow and Sanfrancisco measured in millimeters 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
Our world change everyday, there is no doubt that human must chan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...perfect. Beside live by tradional way, i must admit that live by modern way is f...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, i think, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74932614555 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61169988857 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455525606469 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6033722616 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9047619048 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38095238095 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211594334411 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844102700868 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641323489819 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153738016648 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487129389716 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.