the chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012
The line graph illustrates, parliament membership of woman in European countries like, Germany, Italy, France, UK and Belgium over 12 years. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, all the five countries female present ship was risen dramatically over the period except Belgium. There was a considerable reduction in membership after 2008 in Belgium. However, UK made a significant increase in number of woman in parliament from 3% to 25% over the period given. German parliament occupied with relatively major woman among the given countries with 34% and which is mild upsurge to near 40% in the year of 2012.
Over to Italy, members of female gender was hike up systematically from 26% to about 40% . Likewise, only 25 % of female are worked in France parliament in 2000, whilst, gradual growth was seen when the year ends on 2012 with around 32%. Furthermore, all the given countries remain stable during the year of 2004 to 2008 in the accommodation of female in their parliament out off UK. UK was made a meaningful changes in their parliament with female members since a decade over.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | kashyap sahil | view | |
| 2023-04-11 | kashyap sahil | view | |
| 2020-06-13 | CiaraNguyen | view | |
| 2020-05-15 | Munn Nguyen | 90 | view |
| 2020-05-15 | Hường Nguyễn8 | 78 | view |
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The maps below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below show the percentage of Australian export to 4 countries from 1990 to 2000 67
- The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies next year in Turkey. The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of next year.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the mai 61
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this causefor individual and society. Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing population. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er of woman in parliament from 3% to 25% over the period given. German parliament...
^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... up systematically from 26% to about 40% . Likewise, only 25 % of female are worke...
^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ewise, only 25 % of female are worked in France parliament in 2000, whilst, gradu...
^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n when the year ends on 2012 with around 32%. Furthermore, all the given countrie...
^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...nt out off UK. UK was made a meaningful changes in their parliament with female members...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, likewise
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03296703297 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79481020522 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598901098901 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2581025427 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252064824811 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942929540408 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512365763255 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166049304623 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059196698161 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.