The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994.
A glimpse at the two graphs reveals the ratio of getting married, as well as divorced, in every 1000 people over eight selected nations in the year of 1981 and 1994. All in all, significant declines were witnessed over most nations, while a collective ratio of divorce climbed considerably.
Apparently from the statistic of marriage, USA possessed the highest rate of forming new families in both years, though the figure fell slightly from a staggering number higher than 10 to 9. Likewise, declines of various scales were seen in the nations of UK, Japan, Finland, Germany, France and Italy, with their proportion of marriage dropped from somewhere at the vicinity of 6 to approximately 5. Soaring from 5 to 7, Denmark, by contrast, was the unique country registering a substantial growth in its marrital rate.
With regard to divorce statistic, the greatest ratio, likewise, was printed on USA. Having a remarkable drop, USA stood at 4.5 in 1994. Despite the negligible decrease in Denmark and sustained figure in Germany, other given regions, however, witnessed a moderate climb in this period.
Noteworthy is the fact that Italy, among the eight samples, had a meagre divorce rate of 0.05 in 1994 in spite of the doubled growth in 13 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | kaka singh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | kaka singh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | kaka singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-10 | Anhngoc | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-31 | Tracyabc | 84 | view |
- A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.You should write at least 250 words. 89
- Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions. 89
- Describe a custom from your country that you would like people from other countries to adopt.Explain your choice, using specific reasons and examples. 84
- Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communications, such as letters, emails, or telephone calls.Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 89
- Nowadays it is more difficult for children to concentrate to pay attention in school.Discuss the causes and propose some solutions. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, likewise, so, well, while, as well as, in spite of, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03846153846 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72622861939 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658653846154 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.823018503 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14168855903 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527936385034 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360274628715 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822337273974 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290028716694 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.