Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages? Discuss your views.
With the rise in modernisation , a man has transformed his life trmendously. He has progressed from walking bare footef in the jungles to take the first step on the moon. Nevertheless, there are some issues which remain orrevocable and as complex as rver. For instance, the given topi asserts that do disadvantages of throwing away of old things are more than its economic advantages? I shall explore the dimensions of this topic through examples and assertions and shape my opinion by the end.
One of the biggest reason of discrimination in the society especially among the youngsters is adaption of new things. Young people adapt new things to make their status high in front of others. Youngsters are of the opinion that they will not repeat clothes that they once had weared. Due to adaption of new things by some students; others have to face its ill effects through discrimination. According to a survey conducted by psycological department of Harvard university, it is revealed that eight out of ten students felt that they are discriminated by other students because of their old fashioned dressing style.
Moving ahead, there are some advantages of adapting new things. People can update themselves by adapting new things. The adaption of new things is worthwhile to enhance one's intellectual skills. People who were earlier using compuers and are now using laptops are benefitted as laptops are easy to carry and require very less space as compared to computers. According to a survey conducted by google, it is revealed that people who had adapted new things are more satisfied and are leading a more comfortable life.
Overall, it is concluded that one should adapt new things only if old things are no more in the condition of using. Masses should adapt 3R' s method:reuse, recycle and reduce. It refers to using of things again and again, recycling things and reduce the use of non- biodegradable things. Government should make people aware about various schemes about using old things. These initiative measures should be taken by both public and government in collabration to make world a better place to live.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-20 | Mansi patel | 71 | view |
- It is said that adultrated food is key reason behind detriorated health of all age group masses. How far you agree or disagree with it? 73
- The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 84
- Some people believe that childre should learn to paint or draw at school.others believe that it is just a waste of time.Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages 87
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages Discuss your views 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
With the rise in modernisation , a man has transformed his life trmendou...
^^
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ex as rver. For instance, the given topi asserts that do disadvantages of throwin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04815864023 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8304238967 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56657223796 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1358630155 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29738999921 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892128083114 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839258238701 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164913695458 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326071761026 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.