In some countries, using the internet in school is getting popular. Is it positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The emergence of the Internet has revolutionised our way of living enormously for the past decades, including the utilisation in academic aspect. Admittedly, this alteration in educational system has presented some challenges perplexing students as well as parents and teachers. However, I would content that the overall impact of the Internet is beneficial. These benefits are twofold.
First of all, this is an indisputable fact that the convenience and efficiency fosters the learning processes. Interacting with the search engines connecting countless sources of information ensures the free flow of information, which is essential for students who immerse in their studies. Despite the controversial reliability and accuracy - a problem which is paradoxically due to the liberty of publishment on the Internet - most of the researchers working on it satisfied with the simplified routine in comparison to penetrating books in library.
Further and even more importantly, though, the Internet places the availability of enlighenment and cultivation to an advance level. Established the wireless network in earlier times, people living in city are now equipped with ubiquitous computers, ranging from desktop as well as laptop at home to personal smartphones in their pockets. A few clicks on these ensuing devices in turn allow us embarking on any learning activities, virtually without physical restriction. Moreover, given the immediacy of the Internet, submission of assignment online and instant messaging with teacher and fellow schoolmates are perceived as a derivative of this application.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that the advent of the Internet grants us a positive corollary in school because of the advancement on information exchange and communication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-30 | RockyGagKy | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-30 | RockyGagKy | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-30 | RockyGagKy | 92 | view |
- Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communications, such as letters, emails, or telephone calls.Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 89
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. 73
- Should state museums charge visiting fees or that should be completely free?What is your viewpoint on this issue?Give reasons for your answer. 84
- Nowadays it is more difficult for children to concentrate to pay attention in school.Discuss the causes and propose some solutions. 84
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, well, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72118959108 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3009189978 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646840148699 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4346045854 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106444639647 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328398911754 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283763288313 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0646202528573 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280966632039 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.