Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one's career. TO what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is irrefutable to say that personal development is the base for professional development, be it an affluent impoverished nation. Considering this, some analysts say that personal attribution plays a vital role in one's professional growth, while others argue that there is not correlation between both of these aspects. The following paragraphs will discuss both sides of the contention followed by a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, there is a myriad of arguments which proponents cite for the popularity of the topic. One of the most conspicuous reasons is that person who has a strong desire to improve himself can easily grow professionally. For example, any one who changes himself personally can be able to easily attain his desired professional growth. Hence, not only own development make him personally strong, but also professionally successful.
In addition to the above, another pivotal aspect of the argument is that some people believe that there is no relation between personal and professional growth. They reached on to this conclusion based on the real situations they have seen. A salient example of such attribution is Mukesh Ambani primarily developed based on his professional growth. Therefore, it is apparent that why some people think that there is dependency of self growth on professional development.
The recapitulate from the arguments aforementioned, one can conclude that personal development always plays a major role in most of the people development . However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-24 | Deborajimbi | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-15 | Manisha Verma | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-13 | minapolo | view | |
| 2018-07-01 | dumpalpr | 88 | view |
| 2018-07-01 | dumpalpr | 80 | view |
- What are the benefits of living in big cities, as opposed to rural areas? What are the problems of rural areas and how can they be solved? 55
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one's career. TO what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Learn from personal experience works better than formal education. 55
- Some cities have vehicle free days when private cars, trucks and motorcycles are banned from the city centers. People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses, taxis, and metro on vehicle free days.To what extent do you think advantages o 77
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...asily grow professionally. For example, any one who changes himself personally can be a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... growth on professional development. The recapitulate from the arguments aforementioned, one ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r role in most of the people development . However, with the benefit of hindsight,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45564516129 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18441735058 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592741935484 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7279578728 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.076923077 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26530952251 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956088274347 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765680665861 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158813425683 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225492749129 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.