School teachers are more responsible for the social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is often a divergent opinion on whether school teachers or parents ought to be responsible for the social and intellectual progress of pupils. I believe this is true as students spend the most productive part of their time and formative years with their school teachers.
To begin with, children are at a very impressionable age in school and whatever their teachers tell them is the final word for them. They generally do not question teachers and follow them. For example, I owe all my social skills and intellectual advancement to my school teachers and still remember their guidance even after decades. Moreover, right from eight in the morning to around two or three in the afternoon when a child is fresh and energetic, is spent with school teachers who can mold them in a positive way towards advancement with various lesson and activities. This process continues right from pre-nursery until senior secondary classes and students are continually under the influence of their teachers who are the most important influencers in the life of children.
On the contrary, few argue that parents are more in control of the growth of intellect and social skills of students vis-a-vis teachers. They opine that parents are the first teachers and what education they impart to their little ones is more lasting and effective. Besides, parents are often an often a role model for their children and tend to emulate their father and mother. Hence, parents must be answerable for the intellectual and social growth of their children.
In conclusion, according to me, while parents do have an influence on the upbringing of children with reference to their social and intellectual growth, the primary responsibility lies with teachers since children spend a larger part of there growing years at school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-22 | vinshu koul | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-01 | venky1100 | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-14 | Ajay.dhariwal | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-01 | Mafijur | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-01 | Mafijur | 61 | view |
- Nowadays the importance of teachers is diminishing due to increased availability of alternative sources to students. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement? 56
- Nowadays the importance of teachers is diminishing due to increased availability of alternative sources to students To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 73
- School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. 61
- Some people want academic subjects such as history and physics to be taught at secondary school. Others want practical skills such as mechanical and gardening to be taught. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... with school teachers who can mold them in a positive way towards advancement with various lesson...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with, with reference to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73669293516 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52027027027 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9647282597 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.416666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243091330491 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103046197568 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541944204856 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163199874695 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226857269964 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.