Some say you should always marry for love; others say that in an uncertain world it's wiser to marry for money.
Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion.
You should write at least 250 words.
Over the past decades, a surge has been seen in divorce rate in some affluent nations. This phenomenon has sparked a heated debate on whether marriage should be a result of emotion or an acquirement of materialistic benefits like financial support and reputation. This essay is set to explore both positions, yet I would contend that love is the key whereas pure materialistic family is likely to translate to a misery.
First of all, evident is the fact that most couples who get married for the first time have a yearning to stay with one's partner in the entire life, and to conceive a baby under their names. In fact, this is a corollary of compassion - an emotion that allow one be solicitous and care about another with intimacy. Consequently, parents are then willing to lavish their time and resources to the children, as well as everything in their family, to intensify the relationship among them.
However, recent interviews conducted by the Love Society showed some alternative ideology pervading in the minds of the youngsters. Indeed, sense of affection is not a crucial factor prior to their marriage; over half of the respondents argue that they would get closer eventually afterward, while 80% would be perplexed about the shortfall of economical resources might hinder the development of family on the condition that they get married to those less wealthy. This perception could be readily expound in a society that deemed incredibly materialistic. Therefore, financial support accompanied with the wealthy is not only at attraction, but also an assurance to their foreseeable future.
Given the arguments from both views, I would defend the notion that love is the most pivotal element that leads to prolonged relationship, and the well-being of the members from these ensuing families can be flourished with affection.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-03 | RockyGagKy | 84 | view |
- In some countries, using the internet in school is getting popular. Is it positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 78
- The table shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 52
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples. 89
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
- Traditional classrooms in the past held lectures with multiple participants Now that technology makes it easier and faster for students to access information the need for traditional classroom discussion is becoming less popular It s because the internet 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...first time have a yearning to stay with ones partner in the entire life, and to conc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...uld be perplexed about the shortfall of economical resources might hinder the development ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, while, in fact, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15333333333 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88897893196 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.0695950376 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.545454545 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0881948544921 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310215455124 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0195267763329 0.0667982634062 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0492465689282 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0139900800871 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.