The diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment.
The given diagrams illustrate the information about the process of improve the cooking device. It is clear and coherent representation.
Overall, it is evident that there are three various stages to the process, the first cooking equipment was simple other hand the last nd new techniques are complex.
It can be seen that in the first stage of cooking the cooking in pot by the stone in fire on the grass, and triges. Apart from this in the second diagram the cooking are done in the clay sheild which protect from the wind and encolse the heat.
In the third stage the cooking equipment is very complex they are all made by metal. In this there is a one door in one side we can enter the air and other side we can removed the ash. The charcoal is also used as fuel and it is burnt on the grate which was inside of shield line made with clay. In addition to this there is a handle for easy transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-28 | levanhoan123 | view | |
| 2022-07-28 | levanhoan123 | view | |
| 2022-07-28 | levanhoan123 | view | |
| 2022-03-13 | namviet | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-18 | Khanhu010101 | 78 | view |
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000. 67
- It is said that adulterated food is key perosn behind deteriorated health of all age group masses. Hiw for you agree or disagree with it? 78
- Describe the table and pie chart below which shows the spending habits of teenagers in Australia. The table shows the amount of dollars spent on various activities per week while the pie chart shows the amount spent on education. 73
- The bar charts below show the marriage and divorce statistics for nine countries in 1981 and 1994. 67
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperature and rainfall in the city of kolkata. 61
Comments
The diagram illustrates the…
The diagram illustrates the process of improving cooking utensils. It is indicated that there are three distinct stages from the process, from the initially simple to eventually complicated equipment.
At the first stage in the development of cooking equipment, there is only a simple cooking pot balanced on many stones over many twigs and grass. Moving to the second image, it shows how the equipment has improved by building a shield made of clay around the stone to protect the fire. There is also a hole that is used to put the sticks, as well as, twigs inside the shield.
At the final stage of the diagram, the equipment is more complex. The clay shied is replaced with a metal one combined with a door in order for the entry of air and the flow out of ash. Above the shield, there is an equipment used to support port with handles, as well as clay lining surrounds the utensils. In the bottom, there is a grate for putting charcoal inside.
In fact, cooking equipment has developed significantly to a more complicated level.
The given diagram…
The given diagram illustrates the various stages in the manufacturing of the cooking utensils.
Overall, it is evident from the diagram that utensils were made in three stages from a simple pot to complex equipment.
Looking more deeply into the diagram, the main products were heated in a simple pot which then transforms into a beautifully placed clay shield. The clay shield is not covered in order to allow heat loss and to avoid excessive temperature.
Moving forward, the last stage of manufacturing took place in a very sophisticated and complex instrument. It is covered with a clay lining and has a handle to support its' handling. Also, there is a door in the metal equipment which allows the workers to remove the ash and air from the equipment. In the middle of the instrument, a grate is present to accommodate the charcoal. Similarly, there are three handles to support a pot.
Words: 152
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'remove'
Suggestion: remove
...can enter the air and other side we can removed the ash. The charcoal is also used as f...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, so, third, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 746.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38823529412 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32233029371 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.130830348 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8888888889 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199882649408 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748032457562 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692656233279 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123744511004 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482030081055 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.