the chart below shows the percentage of health spending among GDP in five countries in 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart compares the proportion of money spent on health among GDP in five nations in 2002
Overall, it is clear that the total spending on health had the highest percentage in the five countries, and Americans paid a large amount of money for health.
It is noticeable that Italy, France, and Germany had the similar figures in the chart. People in these three countries paid less money for the private health, approximately 3%, just 2%, and nearly 4% respectively. In terms of the public spending, the percentage of these figures were blow 10%.
Looking at Japan and USA, the percentage of total spending in Japan is about 1% more than that in USA, at 14%. The public spending between these two countries was similar, at almost 10% and 10% respectively. However, it is worth noting that the proportion of money spent by Americans on private health researched to 12%, which was the highest one compared with other four countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-03 | danieltseng06 | 91 | view |
- In most countries, prison is an effective solution for the problem of crime. Some people think it is a more effective solution to provide a better education. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- the chart below shows the percentage of health spending among GDP in five countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- Some people think that robots are very important for humans’ future development. Other, however, think that robots are a dangerous invention that could have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- The increase in food production owes much to fertilizers and better machinery but some people think that it has a negative impact on human health and community To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'blowed', 'blown'.
Suggestion: blowed; blown
...g, the percentage of these figures were blow 10%. Looking at Japan and USA, the p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88819875776 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58956308403 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3161711784 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.428571429 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184264736625 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753373730444 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714525230047 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135272213832 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656733830533 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.