Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive social welfare from governments in order for them to continue their work.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and examples.
It is evident that artists often struggle financially to pursue their profession. Some people believe that the regimes should help them financially so that they can continue their work. This essay will discuss why governments should be cautious in who they support and provide financial support to only dedicated artists.
Most of the artists indeed earn very less that is not enough for their survival as well. So the question arises that if they are not able to survive with their salaries then how they would be able to pursue their professions? Despite being hard working if they are not able to earn enough to carry their arts then the governments, for example, should help such dedicated artist financially. Therefore, when they will get helped financially, they will work more hard to get excel in their artistry and it will in turn thrive the nation's art and culture as a whole.
On the contrary, not all the artists are seriously dedicated toward their professions so supporting all the artists financially is worthless. In such cases the governments should always be considerate enough before helping them financially. Some false artists, for instance, simply take financial advantage on the name of true artists. Hence, it is worthwhile to help only those artists who are truly devoted toward their professions.
This essay discussed how governments should be careful while supporting the artists financially because not all artists are true ones. In my opinion, governments should of course provide financial benefits to only dedicated artists not to all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-05 | jyotikumari042 | 70 | view |
| 2018-02-12 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
| 2018-02-12 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
| 2018-02-12 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | kamranakhtar20@hotmail.com | 77 | view |
- The use of plastic for packaging, drinking straws, and other single-use, disposable items has increasingly been highlighted as disastrous for the environment. Many online petitions have been set up to demand food manufacturers and supermarkets change thei 72
- Paper books are and will always be superior to e-books.Discuss the advantages or disadvantages of e-books with regards to this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 67
- Schools should prepare students for university rather than for work How far do you agree with this statement Support your point of view with reasons or examples 80
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers to not over-package in the first place?Choose which side you must agree with and discuss why you chose that position. 70
- Poverty is a major issue world wide Many charities exist to help collect monetary donations Who should decide what the donations are spent on The people in need or the charitable organisations Support your point of view with details from your own experien 53
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, of course, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20866141732 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67856899285 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511811023622 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.9 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2503600019 50.4703680194 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.769230769 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220938614059 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930137864823 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423747200639 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147912871629 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218933588843 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.