The bar charts below show the marriage and divorce statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994.
The given vertical charts reveal the information about the marriage and divorce statistics by eight countries during the year of 1981 and 1994. The data is calibrated in thousand which is clearly and coherently represented.
It can be seen that, in 1981 the marriage statistics in USA was 11 thousand whereas in Denmark it was only 5 thousand. Moreover, neither France nor Italy crossed the data from 6 thousand. Furthermore, the marriage statistics of Japan, Finland, and Denmark in 1994 were 6 thousand, 5 thousand, and 7 thousand respectively.
As far as trend was concerned, USA had the highest ratio of divorce that was 5. 5 thousand in 1981, and 4.5 thousand in 1994; While Italy had the lowest ratio of divorce. The divorce rate of Germany in the year of 1981 and 1994 was same. However, the divorce rate of Japan France, and Denmark was 1.5 thousand, 2 thousand, and 2.5 thousand respectively.
Overall, it is evident that the marriage rate of USA was doubled as compared to divorce rate in these two years whereas in Italy the divorce rate was very low as compared to marriage rate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-17 | Dharamsingh12 | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-17 | Sandeep kaur13 | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-17 | Dharamsingh12 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays animal experiment are widely used to develop new medicine and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of th 61
- The table below gives information about favourite pastimes in different countries in pecentage. 61
- Young people in disturbed economics tend to become violent causing destruction to life and property. What are the causes, impacts and remedies of such problem. 56
- Some companies have uniforms for their staff which must be worn at all times. What are the advantages for a company of having a uniform? Are there any benefits of having a uniform for the staff? 79
- The diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...981 and 1994. The data is calibrated in thousand which is clearly and coherently represe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8253968254 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71414647373 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486772486772 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1064684388 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221611503925 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110717065092 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119095941559 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167870058283 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974947262747 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.