Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Since the time of evolution of human beings, people are facing the unavoidable impacts of changing lifestyles. Some people admire these living patterns and take them open-heartedly while others are far more conservative towards changes. Before concluding, we need to rationalize both aspects independently and critically.
To begin with, the preservation of culture and heritage is a foremost benefit while avoiding changing in life pattern. As a matter of fact, generation is following the same momentum in life with respect to their dresses, eating habits or music etc. in some countries are being considered to be successful in keeping their ancestor alive in themselves. To cite an example, China’s infrastructure is the best of all. Their government abandon the destruction of old buildings and trying to keep them preserved with the renovation. In other words, heritage can be maintained by putting barriers on the path of so-called modernization.
On the flip side, diversity of vision in life can sharpen the experiences of people with long-term beneficial impact on their lives. Although, doing the same work, again and again, can be an easy task for anyone but it will not allow does to border the vision. Hence, people with the tendency to according to the need of today modern world can sharpen their skills well as they are having a variety of experiences of the different sort rather them repeating the same task in the same fashion. For example, it is a general observation in the survey that people with multi experiences jobs can adjust in any organization as they are not confined in their thoughts. One can say that gaining unlimited knowledge and information with binging alteration in the living pattern cannot be overload in toward world.
To sum up, I pen down by writing my opinion that life from shortage has reached to the era of technologies as it followed a rule of continuous change which is inevitable so it should be taken with welcoming attitudes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | veeram34420356 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | aliabshar | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | khanhptk162 | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | kartavyasoni25 | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | Cundaigia | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Happiness is considered very important in life? Why is it difficult to define? What factors are important in achieving happiness? 73
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 84
- Today, high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
- In many countries, schools have severe problems with student behaviour.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, well, while, for example, as a matter of fact, in other words, to begin with, to sum up, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11009174312 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9245228882 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60244648318 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1862117914 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.4 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134109225597 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439491022911 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0227790827831 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773926381957 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239143133176 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.