"More information available online so library books are useless." Agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the using online information and library books getting useless and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated dispute. Although contested by many that the matter of online data achievement is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that online information can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the significance of using online information instead of library books can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of electronic books, as well as internet access, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered high-speed data transfer. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both storybooks and science books apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, availability of online information and its effect on library books usage might increase the consequences of borrowing a book from a library. Moreover, fundamental aspects of social media can relate to this reality that the demerits of mobile phones pertain to laptop and PC usage. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of lack of information is correlated negatively with reliable data. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the threat of viruses.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of comparing online information versus library books usage far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of downloading necessary data from the internet prove the significance of virtual education, but also pinpoint saving the time implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- do you think the significance of the English language as an international language will be lost with globalization or its significance will increase with globalization? what is your opinion? 85
- "More information available online so library books are useless." Agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56164383562 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15299200821 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609589041096 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0260701623 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207446072969 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724549794663 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776073653846 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125908335655 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328094794385 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.