Some believe that modern technology has made people less socially active, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In this modern era, Technology has emerged as a new avatar of communication. We need to agree that people became less active socially in physical presentation. But this statement is outweighed by the same people who are highly participating and making themselves active through social platforms through networking. This coin has both head and tail, I will discuss both views and prove that the way in which social activities of people changed but they did not became less socially active.
Kick starting the discussion with head of the coin, If we go back to the days where there is no availability of social networking platforms, People used to get together frequently for discussing their issues and used to share their feelings. At only that point of time people comes to know what is happening with other people's life. So there will be an exchange of everything only when they met at some point.
But flipping the coin to tail, At present there is an intense availability of internet and social networking platforms, of course people reduced physical presentation in social activities but they are communicating more frequently with the help of online social networking platforms. For an instant example, Seminars became Webinars these days where we can take part in a seminar through an social networking platform which does not need a physical attention. Communication became more often through online which is leading to exchange of issues, feelings and other important news.
To conclude, Standing on my point of view on this issue, I can Strongly believe that the way of people's social activeness has taken a new path but they did not became less socially active.
- Some psychologists think that the best way to overcome stress of everyday life is to spend a portion of the day doing absolutely nothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Scientists have been warning for many years already that in order to protect the environment people should use less energy. However, most people do not change their ways of living. What is causing this behaviour? How can people be encouraged to change? 61
- Some believe that modern technology has made people less socially active while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 65
- School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial. However, most make no effort to do so. Why do you think this is happening? What are some simple actions that could help the environment? 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 461, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
...ties of people changed but they did not became less socially active. Kick starting ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 389, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e we can take part in a seminar through an social networking platform which does n...
^^
Line 10, column 161, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
...s has taken a new path but they did not became less socially active.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09386281588 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77024478129 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530685920578 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.465053267 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.272727273 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 7.06120827912 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238462694223 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983574693126 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695785788759 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158249884656 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665613190242 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.