The real talent of popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
Continuous feedback is always helpful to deliver better next time. Similarly, an adroit musician shall be assessed frequently during his lifetime. However, such intermediate assessments help musician to horn skills based on continuous feedback from different genre of audience. Assessment of talent, independent on how renowned he/she is, leads to impartial feedback and eventually helps musician to enhance or focus on inceptive area of music.
Sometimes popular musicians are involved in plegiarism too. These musicians are rife with their flamboyent performance.But such sordid work is vituperative and at the same time no one is able to discern such work is copied from other non-popular artists' work. In such cases, musician himself/herself can flout against them. And apparently possibility of plegiarism can be plummeted. Such action helps in eliminating pretentious talent in the industry.
Many neophyte follow some other talent closely and venerate them as idol. Such muscians are impressed by their idols' hackeneyed performance and used to track new activities of theirs and existence of this tradition largely depends on assessment of live musician. Following to right talent helps to grow neophyte to erudite.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of human to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 33
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Write a letter to your friend. In your letter: - Provide a short update about your life since you saw him/her last - Explain why you will be traveling to his/her city- Say what you would like to do when you visit his/her city 78
- The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more a matter of personality than of training Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects f 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
... rife with their flamboyent performance.But such sordid work is vituperative and at...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun neophyte seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many neophytes'.
Suggestion: Many neophytes
...pretentious talent in the industry. Many neophyte follow some other talent closely and ve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'follows'.
Suggestion: follows
...lent in the industry. Many neophyte follow some other talent closely and venerate ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, however, if, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 11.3162921348 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 2235.4752809 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 184.0 442.535393258 42% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6902173913 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 4.55969084622 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01860468493 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 215.323595506 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.695652173913 0.4932671777 141% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 704.065955056 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.088266433 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.25 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191891837843 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722076611035 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469419442276 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123274395315 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322472437412 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.13 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.38706741573 122% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.