In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop.
Recently, the phenomenon of replacing the large shopping mall with the small local shop in town as an important issue and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the importance of replacing the small local shops with the large malls in town and cities can be a plus, and I will analyze throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the small local shops that replaced with the large shopping malls in the large cities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, replacement of the small local stores with the large shopping centre might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of creating a larger shopping centre instead of the small local stores in the town far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | a.aghyi1989 | 88 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Jaskaransingh11 | 72 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | dalwindergill | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | 3pid | 88 | view |
- Many companies involve employees in decision-making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 88
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should building more roads to facilitate car owner ship? Agree or disagree? 77
- Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 88
- Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: A
...ase the consequences of critical needs. A a tangilble example, some scientific rese...
^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...ase the consequences of critical needs. A a tangilble example, some scientific re...
^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'A' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: A; A
...ase the consequences of critical needs. A a tangilble example, some scientific rese...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45333333333 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03336263722 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8653364848 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.727272727 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420418301 0.242375264174 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152723351528 0.0925447433944 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174718395491 0.071462118173 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249247004429 0.151781067708 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965077128999 0.0609392437508 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.