The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table gives information about the amount of forested land in six different areas in three years.
Overall, what stands out from the table is that the forested land in the Europe was higher than the other areas in three years. By contrast, the amount of forested land was by far the lowest in the Oceania.
Looking at the details, regarding the Africa and the South America, there were considerable decreases in the amount of forested land by 58 million of hectares and 64 million of hectares, respectively, in the period between 1990 and 2005. Moreover, the figure of the North America experienced a slight decline to 705 million in 2000 which remained stable in 2005. The trend in the Oceania was quite similar to the North America, starting at 199 million in 1990 and then decreasing slightly to 197 million at the final.
In the other details, despite falling to 570 million in 2000, the amount of forested land in the Asia saw a moderate increase to 584 million in 2005. As regards the Europe, the forested land was at 989 million in 1990 and then finally hitting a peak of 1001 million in 2005.
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside big cities.Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- The table below highlights data on the number of travellers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made. 73
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, then, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67857142857 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42468283262 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489795918367 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3281442765 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204315377132 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105636605837 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488480686809 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145569264652 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368732133981 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.