For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is too much controversial debate about whether teachers or parents have more significant influence on fostering children’s intellect and individual characteristics. While I agree that teacher plays a vital role in the growth of children, I also believe that parents’ roles are essential to facilitate children’s comprehensive development.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why teachers’ role is critically important in enhancing the ability of children’s intellectual and social growth. One reason is that education environment in school allows a large number of students to socialize and interact with other peers through recreational activities or events. For example, during the school years, there are a lot of extra-curriculum activities for youngsters, which will cultivate children’s expressiveness, improve communication skill and show their intelligence on various fields. Furthermore, it would be necessary for young students with the presence of professional teachers or guided person in education system. This is because those who give them countless opportunities to promote personal ability such as problem-solving, logical thinking and reasoning. For instance, in classroom, teacher has enabled their students to expose their opinion, learn how to tackle complex problems or hold useful discussion among other students, which are important things for the cultivation of an academically and socially successful child.
On the other hand, parental involvement can have an equally positive impact on children’s cognitive ability and social development. Firstly, parents are those who supply their offsprings with their chance of developing a relationship, communicating and interacting with others. A healthy relationship and strong sense of community would be improved dramatically by enjoying various social activities, for example. Secondly, homeschool parents can dedicate most of their time to delivering high-quality and valuable life lessons , so the children would be able to progress easily and naturally. For instance, during formation years, parents become a good model role for their kids to follow them, they are able to not only mimic their parents in their language but also learn the way that respond to all situation in aspects of their life.
In conclusion, both teachers and parents play an equally important role when it comes to nurturing children’s personal traits and social skills.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport why is it not popular in many places? How to increase its popularity 89
- Some people say young people playing electronic and computer games learn useful skills but some people say young people are wasting their time. Discuss and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... education environment in school allows a large number of students to socialize and interact with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g high-quality and valuable life lessons , so the children would be able to progre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39680190939 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.3413490691 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.714285714 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323874541364 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107117493286 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677841301447 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175597816752 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763950988109 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.