The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
For decades, developed countries have been handing out financial aid to the in-need ones. Some argue that nations with great prosperity should find alternative ways to assist poor countries as funding is not an effective solution. I believe that there are indeed other methods to support poor countries.
It is understandable why people think that money is no longer the solution to tackle the issue of poverty in third-world and developing countries. One reason lies in the slow-paced growth of these nations’ economy and industry. With such slow development, the money stream from rich nations could not sufficiently turn the situation around. Financial experts have stated that up to thirty percent of the five superpowers’ national revenue is the minimum amount of money to get the third-world countries out of poverty, which is an absolutely unachievable task. Another reason is that prosperous countries are always skeptical about the profit they receive when supporting the poor ones. Although this money is considered as a charity or donation, superpowers still expect to have something in return for example allegiance which is usually uncertain.
Fortunately, feasible measurements besides financial assistance could be taken into consideration. Firstly, educational support could be in great help to ameliorate a country’s development in the long term. The distribution of well-trained teachers from developed countries might deliver better education to the workforce of the third-world nations, which definitely unveils a brighter future in both economy and industry’s growth. Secondly, the health care system in the third-world countries is costly ineffective. Therefore, minimizing this matter by providing high-skilled physicians would also be of significant support to lower the expense of local residents who are currently in need of money.
In conclusion, I think that rich countries should take other ways to aid the poorer because money is not efficiently helpful. With any solution, the eradication of poverty is always an important mission globally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-08 | Harkirat123 | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-08 | Harkirat123 | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-11 | drtruong92 | 84 | view |
| 2017-10-31 | lenguyenynhitk | 84 | view |
| 2016-03-10 | TSEB | 90 | view |
- Some cities do not restrict how stylish and unique can houses and offices be that people construct Is this trend positive or negative 90
- You normally go shopping in the area where you live However you think some of the facilities for shoppers could be improved Write a letter to your local newspaper In your letter say in general what you like about shopping in your area say what is wrong wi 74
- There is increase of noise in our daily lives nowadays Why is this a problem What can be done to reduce it The noise pollution is increasing at an alarming rate around the globe I shall shed some light on the possible causes of increasing noise and what m 84
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since the computer technology is now replacing their functions To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that it is a good thing，while others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, well, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69108280255 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18693712172 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611464968153 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2572332426 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6875 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180281247383 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586967094009 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481090612364 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117037857585 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190372403734 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.