With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.
To what extent do you agree?
As the present day is the age of globalization, the use of the internet and other latest communication technologies has become a phenomenon, while there is a notion asserts that widespread use of the online communications will replace the direct communications between peoples because of the enormous increase of the population. However, I completely disagree with this perspective.
First and foremost, the advanced communications systems are playing a pivotal role in business and economics world, whereas, nowadays, a large majority of companies are working on developing their communication systems especially multinational companies because of its critical need to obtain permanent communications among all sites over the world. For instance, a multinational company which has many sites distributed over 22 countries could obtain a better management system by using smart communications system even in meetings could be by using smart applications such like Skype, TED, and SAP. Consequently, an enormous saving in terms of cost and time.
Furthermore, students along with aspirational hard workers whose living in foreign countries for study/work purposes should be in permanent communications with their families for keeping their productivity high. For instance, a student who joined an international university located in a foreign country could be able to get the parents guidance and obtain their support. In other words, smartphones and internet communications having the ability to make peoples more close.
Some may argue that online connection made people in total isolation even if they live in the same room, where everyone will be concerned with his/her smart device and the direct interface will obsolete tradition as a result. However, I totally disagree with this point of view, and strongly believe that the internet connection could give anyone the direct way to communicate with others and develop both of culture and awareness.
To conclude, by seeing both sides of the spectrum, it is clearly evident that the internet and text messaging will not make the face to face communication a footnote of the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-16 | Mohamedyousef777 | 95 | view |
| 2018-09-06 | Mohamedyousef777 | 78 | view |
| 2018-02-28 | uzma2011 | 41 | view |
| 2018-02-28 | uzma2011 | 11 | view |
| 2018-02-27 | shivangi patel | 11 | view |
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree? 78
- Some employers want to be able to contact their stuff any time, even on holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 89
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree? 95
- Discipline is an ever increasing problem in modern schools. Some people think that discipline should be the responsibilities of teachers, while others think this is the role of parents. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...oreign country could be able to get the parents guidance and obtain their support. In o...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...y to make peoples more close. Some may argue that online connection made people in t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, whereas, while, for instance, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5243902439 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15261593125 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582317073171 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.6962514955 49.4020404114 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.727272727 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8181818182 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253902812673 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968442463974 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783724129244 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15839565258 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795057640681 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.0 9.78957915832 225% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.