How widely of you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause?
Recently, the phenomenon of spending too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the personal life experience with family can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, spending time in personal life can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of complex issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. As per my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this remarkable phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, spending time on work might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the faulty system could relate to this reality that the demerits of unnecessary usages pertain to health problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this common phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of personal life experience far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | shivek | 100 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | NataliaTraeger | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Hurry | 75 | view |
| 2019-05-20 | ajayaryanone | 77 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 85
- More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree? 43
- More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, what are the positive and negative impact on life and work. 11
- More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59927797834 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14633728052 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628158844765 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0267002619 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211117955765 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708186563173 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112354295187 0.071462118173 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12052295826 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095674151448 0.0609392437508 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.