Should money be spent on space exploration or it can be better used to reduce poverty. Discuss
It is incontrovertible fact that everything change rapidly but some issues which became a main threat for society. The regular investment on space exploration give some benefits but on the other hand to reduce the poverty is a major duty. However, this investment should be continually used for the space exploration because it already helpful to reduce the poverty.
To embark with, there are plethora of reasons why money should be on the space exploration. The first and foremost is it give the convenient life to the people because the money is used for launch the satellites. And, it provides better life style through the wireless and break-less communication. As well as, people use the God system to find the different destination. Moreover, very effective radar system to protect the human feel from the invaders of another countries and it treated the many diseases would be good example of this cancer diseases nowadays the doctor do the treatment of this critical disease with dad is active rays.
On the other side, why need to reduce the poverty is important. Initially, it is the ethical duty of the government as well as the citizens because they change the miserable condition of poor. Also, they will provide the appropriate life to the poor people with the help of food, clothes and shelter. Furthermore, if they do not do it, it will bring to other problems like illiteracy or crime. To epitomize, if they will uneducated they will not do any job, and they will not have money so, the fulfil their need they will do started the crime.
In conclusion, both matter are very important. But, this money spends on the space exploration it is continually spent on this. Because, the space exploration develop the many job sectors such as shopping centres, social networking jobs and some other which provide the job every low and high profession. And, it automatically helpful to reduce the poverty.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-09-18 | mandeep bal | 80 | view |
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 92
- The diagram below shows time spent watching tv by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999 61
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food which is having a negative effect on both family and societies. How far this statement is true use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 61
- Should money be spent on space exploration or it can be better used to reduce poverty Discuss 80
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food which is having a negative effect on both family and society. How far this statement is true use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...y job, and they will not have money so, the fulfil their need they will do started the cri...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95356037152 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70919946024 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523219814241 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5159128169 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1176470588 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25614313575 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835276619218 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102327767323 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158804387998 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866408397291 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.