The graph shows the percentage of male and female Academic Staff members across the faculties of major University in 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied histogram delineates the information men and women academic staff across the faculties run by a major university during the year 2012. The data is calibrated in per centum, which is represented clearly and coherently.
To commence with, it is seen that, in year 2012 there were only three faculties where females were leading from men which were arts, education and medicine. Furthermore, in faculties such as engineering, business and science womens were extremely less, compared to men with 18%, 26% and 29% respectively.
Probing ahead, males were three time more than the females in engineering faculty with 82 percentage. Moreover, in business, law, science men were half more than women with 62%, 60% and 61% during the year 2012.
Overall, it is evident that, men were highest in most of the faculties and they were maximum in engineering and minimum in education in the year 2012, whereas women were topmost in education and least in engineering totally opposite from men.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-17 | Bao Linh Le | 92 | view |
| 2019-01-16 | arfaat | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-24 | Rajan khehra | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-24 | Rajan khehra | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-24 | Rajan khehra | 56 | view |
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantage 66
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce the consumption for fossil fuels such as gas oil and coal To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement Give your own opinion 88
- The graph below shows how prices of “high-tech gadgets” changed over time in Some country.Write a report for a university tutor describing the information shown.Write at least 150 words 67
- Some people believe that reducing speed limits is the best option for road safety improvement. Do you think there are other measures that could put in place? What are advantages and disadvantages of this? 73
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19135802469 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7043307802 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586419753086 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6998302809 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133873647868 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765217799437 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840276047813 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977406083616 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652350992312 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.