The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The graph compares average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in four countries the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007. From the general perspective, different trends in the amount of carbon dioxide emissions could be observed, including a growth in Italy and Portugal, a reduction in the United Kingdom and Sweden.
It is evident from the information provided that the United Kingdom had the highest of the amount of carbon dioxide emissions at nearly 11 tonnes in 1967, followed by Sweden, Italy, and Portugal. From 1967 to 1997, the United Kingdom's carbon dioxide emissions witnessed a significant decline to under 10 tonnes. Meanwhile, despite a considerable rise in 1977, Sweden's carbon dioxide emissions experienced a substantial drop from nearly 9 tonnes to roughly 6 tonnes. On the other hand, the amount of carbon dioxide emissions in Italy grew remarkably from just over 4 tonnes to nearly 8 tonnes, significantly surpassing Sweden's carbon dioxide emissions in the early 1990s. Similarly, Portugal's carbon dioxide emissions rose remarkably from over 1 tonne to over 5 tonnes.
Between 1997 and 2007, the United Kingdom's and Sweden's carbon dioxide emissions continued its reduction from the previous period, while this figure in Portugal increased slightly to nearly 6 tonnes. Meanwhile, the amount of carbon dioxide emissions in Italy remained unchanged in this period.
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 84
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41176470588 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73557761014 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502262443439 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5365492805 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.888888889 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428320536701 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232968397395 0.103423049105 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138015625901 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.344635463767 0.15604864568 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999539311448 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.