Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Having glimpse of the world, we will be marveled at the variety of news resources from which we can get information all over the world. Evidently, as Internet become prevailing in the contemporary society, new resources become part of people’s daily life, including traditional media, news website and news app on the mobile phones. Recently, a controversial proposal was brought to public eye, suggesting that in order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. This standpoint may contains some truth. However, from my point of view, I disagree with the statement.
To begin with, too many news resources will affect the ability to tell the truth. To illustrate, news television programs tend to report news in a way that benefits the television station most. Therefore, reporters are likely to hide some truth and tell audiences only the beneficial facts. As a result, different news resources would report a same news in different ways, which is confusing for most of the audiences. For instance, the government of Republic of China planned to enact a law to raise welfare by raising tax three years ago. However, some news programs only tell the benefits of welfare, while other news programs only report the negative effects of raising tax. None of them covered the news in a reasonable way. Evidently, people would get confused by accessing to so many news resources.
Furthermore, it is not applicable to keep informed by many different news resources in that getting information takes much time, and a person hardly have enough time for many different news resources. Generally, work and sleep takes much of one’s daily life, and the time spent on getting information is limited while the means of getting information, such as watching TV or browsing on the Internet, is time wasting. For instance, there are five news app on my phone, and I have subscribed three newspaper. However, only one hour spared for me to read news, as I have to take class. Therefore, I cannot read them thoroughly.
In fact, one news resource is enough to keep a person informed. With the help of Google, the only thing we need to do is to type several keywords, and we can find any news from anywhere we want within just a second. From diseases in Africa to innovation in America, there is so much information that we can keep us informed on the Internet.
To conclude, too many news resources would indeed make us busy handling fake news and other bothersome drawbacks. In considering all the details mentioned above, there is every reason to believe that in order to be well-informed, a person should not get information from many different news resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | naziii | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | shrijan | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | mobinzaarreh | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | bbbbaaakkk | 60 | view |
- access to much information creates problems. agree/disagree 73
- Is visiting museums the best way to learn about a country 73
- land use for human needs or for endangered animals 73
- has technology made children less creative than they were in the past 90
- choosing a job with more vacation time or one with high paying but less vacation time 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 482, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...med, a person must get information from many different news resources. This standpoint may con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'same news'.
Suggestion: same news
..., different news resources would report a same news in different ways, which is confusing f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a reasonable way" with adverb for "reasonable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...sing tax. None of them covered the news in a reasonable way. Evidently, people would get confused b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...t is not applicable to keep informed by many different news resources in that getting informat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...nd a person hardly have enough time for many different news resources. Generally, work and sle...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'apps'?
Suggestion: apps
...ting. For instance, there are five news app on my phone, and I have subscribed thre...
^^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'app' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'apps'.
Suggestion: apps
...ting. For instance, there are five news app on my phone, and I have subscribed thre...
^^^
Line 8, column 271, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... person should not get information from many different news resources.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2258.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98454746137 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81356948861 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492273730684 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3294059748 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1739130435 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6956521739 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26086956522 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335357848919 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102749160139 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102845789475 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214062328961 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857624083478 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.