Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and
large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
It is true that governments and big business have a critical role to play in
improving the environment. While some argue that individuals are therefore
powerless to help combat environmental degradation, I completely disagree with
this view.
On the one hand, both governments and large enterprises can and should take
steps to prevent an ecological crisis. From a government perspective, policies
must be enacted and enforced internationally. These must cover a wide range of
issues, such as the protection of endangered species, a halt to habitat destruction,
and funding research into alternative energy sources, to reduce our dependence
on fossil fuels. In terms of corporate responsibility, producers should not
discharge toxic chemical waste into rivers or the sea and they must cut down on
emissions from factories to fight climate change. They should also aim to
achieve sustainable development by not depleting natural resources, for example
by deforestation.
On the other hand, there are many actions that individuals can take to care for
the environment. These include changing patterns of consumption. For
instance, products which are environmentally friendly, such as green detergent
brands, are widely available in the shops, so that it is easy to change buying
habits. Buying local products is another option, reducing food miles. A different
type of action is to join one of the organisations in the green movement, like
Greepeace. Individuals can help these groups to raise funds to protect plants and
animals on the brink of extinction and to strengthen campaigns for government
interventions and initiatives.
In conclusion, while governments and corporations carry a great responsibility
for alleviating environmental problems, individuals have a significant role to
play. I therefore totally disagree that individuals are powerless to contribute
towards saving the planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-30 | tanyalosthermind | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-19 | Sachita92 | 78 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments andlarge companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 56
- The table illustrates the amount of energy production by five types of fuel in the UK in three different years 1990, 1996 and 2000 measured million tonnes. 67
- The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas in the world. 78
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments andlarge companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 56
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads. Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77351916376 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33250443951 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627177700348 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3957335164 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.466666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 25.0 4.38176352705 571% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144225519457 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475758830209 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501394447262 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0356041279381 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043712792255 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.