The trend of online shopping is increasing significantly. What effect does it have on the environment and society in general?
Shopping has become an indispensable part of everyone's life. Presently, people have materialistic attitudes and therefore the trend of online shopping is gaining prevalence in the entire globe. Here, I would like to account for effects of this happening on the environment and society.
There are multifarious negative outcomes of e-shopping on the community. First and foremost, the majority of people have become extravagant on account of online shopping. To demonstrate, nowadays, masses have tendency to visit online shopping websites where they get allured towards astonishing products that are shown in the gorgeous packaging. Besides this, shopping websites influence the buying behaviour of customers by offering heavy discounts, special offers such as buy one, get one free. As a result, people get encouraged towards unnecessary shopping and they are supposed to become spendthrift these days.
Further emphasizing on my point of view, buying things in abundance is leading to excessive consumerism which further leads to the problem of rubbish. At present, people buy more and more new things that are packed into the wrappers and plastic boxes. Moreover, old consumer durables are being replaced by the new stuff. Ultimately, such wrappers, plastic material and old goods are thrown into landfill sites that are already flooded with trash. Consequently, rubbish problem has become the serious concern in modern societies.
Adding to it, a considerable rise in the rubbish production degrades the quality of environment. To be specific, non biodegradable things do not decay easily at the landfill sites and keep releasing perilous gases in our surroundings. Needless to say, purity and freshness of environment is declining at an alarming rate.
To recapitulate, shopping is considered the need of an hour. Taking the negative outcomes of a remarkable rise in the online shopping, it is prime duty of individuals and government to take proactive measures to 'nip this evil in the bud'.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-25 | binita karki | 95 | view |
| 2018-10-25 | binita karki | 61 | view |
| 2018-10-25 | binita karki | 71 | view |
| 2018-08-07 | PRAMODH k | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-08 | honza | 78 | view |
- Some people think that the media newspapers have the right to publish details of people s private life while other s think it should be controlled Discuss both views 43
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- Do you think that technological advancement has brought more harm than good Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion It is undeniable fact that technologies have been developing day by day and it has changed the society and lifestyles of p 86
- We should pay attention to the opinions of famous people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- The trend of online shopping is increasing significantly What effect does it have on the environment and society in general 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ed to become spendthrift these days. Further emphasizing on my point of view, buying...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47741935484 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97613819289 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603225806452 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2246079651 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38888888889 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160090217539 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474842413412 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051787684112 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088002782179 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811666886567 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.