In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Some think this is good, while others believe this is a problem for a country. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The aging is an undeniable fact of all living creatures and the human race is not an exception to it. The composition of any population consists not only different genders but also various age groups. Few regard a greater number of aged people as an upright while others discord this notion. I will present both the views in this writing and arguments in support of the latter opinion.
Those who believe that having a greater fraction of older as a good sign for the country could argue that they can help next generation in the number of ways. For example, they can impart the knowledge and experience to the youngsters who in turn, can contribute to the development of a country. Furthermore, this phenomenon highlights a positive image of a particular nation as their living average age might be better than others. It also exhibits the characteristics of a quality of life of the dwellers.
Conversely, the better ratio of young people in the human capital is far more superior. This is because they are more energetic and conceiving fresh ideas for the betterment of their nations. Consequently, the countries with such a mix of the population do not need to attract people from the other parts of the world. For Instance, Japan, Europe, USA, and other developed nations have to adopt charming immigration policies to maintain the right balance in the workforce. Additionally, the contributing manpower plays a productive role by remitting a large sum of foreign capital to their countries.
To sum up, I strongly believe that increasing percentage of the elderly population could be detrimental as healthcare, old homes, and other related expenses would increase. Moreover, the proper utilization of the young blood cannot only make up for these expenses but also can make a nation prosperous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-27 | Shweta406 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-29 | ahmedarbani | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-29 | ahmedarbani | 61 | view |
| 2018-11-03 | drtruong92 | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-30 | Ata1986g | 84 | view |
- You have recently started work in a new companyWrite a letter to an English-speaking friend. In your letterexplain why you changed jobsdescribe your new jobtell him/her your other news 84
- Some people think that a hundred years later the world will progress and life will be easier for the majority of people, while others disagree.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?Gi 73
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or to try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job.Write a letter to this friend. In your letter•Say why he/she would not enjoy going to college•Expla 73
- Nowadays science has progressed so much that people are expected to be able to live 100-years in the nearest future. Some people think that it is a positive trend, while others disagree. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun regard seems to be countable; consider using: 'Few regards'.
Suggestion: Few regards
...nt genders but also various age groups. Few regard a greater number of aged people as an u...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, as for, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03333333333 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87401384053 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593333333333 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1232209314 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198786488457 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588042572117 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537881242638 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104724985765 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361190097259 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.