Many people prefer to communicate with their online friends than to socialize with people in their local communities. Do you think it has more advantages than disadvantages?
Online communication is gaining popularity nowadays. It is noticeable that a increasing number of people are more willing to engage with online friends rather than persons around them. This essay will discuss why its disadvantages outweigh advantages.
Certainly, making friends online has its benefits. Firstly, our views could be broadened through communicating with people from all over the world. We could be exposed to people from various cultures, regions, with different religious beliefs and colors, which is a preasured experience that could be hardly obtained by socializing with our own communities. Moreover, online communication is with far more effectiveness than real life physical engagement. For example, we have sufficient time to organize our sentences before sending them to online friends, thus possibilities of misunderstanding are reduced and effectiveness of communication is promoted.
However, outstanding negative impacts of online friends should not be overlooked. One disadvantage would be that some people online are more unreliable than persons we know in real life. Because of the nature of the internet, people could pretend themselves as a completely different person with totally different personalities. For example, a piece of recent Chinese news shows that a young male, in order to date several girls at the same time, set up five social media accounts to communicate with them.
Furthermore, too much online communication will lead to a lack of physical contacts due to less face to face conversations. It has been proved that a certain amount of physical contacts could help human beings maintain a healthy body and mental state, as human could obtain a sense of security and happiness through hand-shaking, cuddling, etc. Therefore, if people spent all their spare time online making friends, they might suffer from mental illnesses in the future.
The last but not the least, focusing on online friends will undermine real life social skills. It is impossible to complete all daily tasks through the internet, which means eventually people need to be equipped with a certain level of interpersonal skills so that they could effectively communicate with others such as their landlord and doctors. Without those essential social skills, it will be hard to live a satisfied life only in the digital world.
In conclusion, it is acknowledged that there is a trend viewing online friends as more important than people in local communities. This essay demonstrated why the negative impacts are far more significant than its benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-02 | lakshayaman | 78 | view |
- the natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What problem does it cause? How can we slove these problems? 84
- Today many young people change their jobs or careers every few years What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 91
- Nowadays people are living in a "thrown-away" society where they use things for a short time and then throw away. What cause this and what problem it may lead to? 73
- Many people prefer to communicate with their online friends than to socialize with people in their local communities Do you think it has more advantages than disadvantages 78
- Students in school or university learn more from classes of teachers than other resources (eg. internet or TV), do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ularity nowadays. It is noticeable that a increasing number of people are more wi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.465 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01376425754 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5525 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4987387244 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.3 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377178936732 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118953751363 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835677000514 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211439080095 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630338886446 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.