High school students are usually not good at managing money. What are the reasons? What are the solutions?
It is witnessed that budget management is becoming a weakness of high school students. There are several reasons behind this situation and several feasible solutions should be recommended to tackle the problem.
To begin with, two major reasons for which teenagers are not good at controlling their budgets can be stated. Firstly, it is the lack of knowledge about money management that makes them find it difficult. Indeed, in many countries, they are not equipped with fundamental economic lessons at school due to their absence from the academic program. This austerity leads to the disability of determining whether an item is necessary, and, therefore, an extravagance when teenagers decide what to purchase. Secondly, family background is also a contributing factor. Indeed, as an age group focusing on expressing themselves and asserting the independence, high school students tend to ignore parent’s advice and channel their budgets into unnecessary products, which they deem essential accoutrements for their lives.
However, a number of solutions must be proposed for this issue. Regarding to high schools, it is highly recommended that basic economic curricula must be integrated into the training program. Moreover, extra-curricular activities, which facilitate students conduct, or run their own business is also useful. Not only do these programs inform them of the financial section but also provide them with essential knowledge about the importance of making the most of their money. In addition, parental involvement also plays a role by teaching their children not to squander their savings at their early ages. Indeed, if it comes to children’s knowledge that money should be spent wisely at the beginning of their childhood, the advice will be more easily accepted and obeyed when they grow up.
Briefly, an cooperative effort of schools and families is vital in improvement of budget managing skills among high school children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-09 | phuong cao | 80 | view |
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home. This is because computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 84
- the only way to improve safety of out roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses.To what extent do you agree? 84
- The bar chart below shows the exporting rate of 4 different types of fruit in the USA, Mexico and South Africa in 2012, measured by tons.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart indicates the number of people who have heart attacks every year in the US.Describe the main feature of the chart and make comparison where relevant 78
- Writing, reading and mathematics are the three major subjects. Some people think that computer skills should be added as a fourth subject. What extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d obeyed when they grow up. Briefly, an cooperative effort of schools and famil...
^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ging skills among high school children.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52649006623 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9585328355 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609271523179 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3099253662 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.266666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238070606316 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724952172904 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438143913423 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150759069182 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344862160171 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.