Nowadays artificial intelligence is being used to drive cars.
Why is this happening?
Is it a positive or negative development?
Artificial intelligence has shown enormous advance with the development of technology and now we see the applications of it in driving of automobiles as well. This is probably due to the demand for minimising traffic accidents and this should be seen as a positive development since it might save many lives by preventing road traffic accidents that are linked to human errors.
Many peoples` lives are being lost on the roads because of traffic accidents every day and over than 95% of them are caused by human errors so there is a necessity to overcome this problem. Tackling this problem may not be so easy, however, with the advancement of artificial intelligence, controlling vehicles safely might reduce the number of accidents significantly. For example, Google has introduced a new car uses artificial intelligence which can identify dangerous situations by monitoring sensors and can alert the driver or take emergency control of the car in order to avoid an accident. Emergency braking, cross traffic detectors, blind spot monitoring, and driver-assist steering can help avoid accidents and save lives in the process.
I believe that using artificial intelligence in driving cars should be welcome as a revolutionary development and should be supported by all of us. All the injuries and fatalities that are caused by traffic accidents linked to human errors, can be prevented with a help of this new technology. The unpredictability of human behaviour and human conditions, for example, driving after alcohol intake or having a heart attack while operating a vehicle that most probably leads to a catastrophic accident can all be avoided by AI operated cars.
In conclusion, using AI in driving cars is an incredible development and should be encouraged to be used in future cars in order to eradicate human errors on the roads. By doing so, I believe we can save many lives.
- In the last 20 years there have been significant developments in the field of information technology (IT), for example the World Wide Web and communication by email. However, these developments in IT are likely to have more negative effects than positive 67
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children`s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016. 78
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed. 73
- Nowadays artificial intelligence is being used to drive cars Why is this happening Is it a positive or negative development 91
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17207792208 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08722872397 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519480519481 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5347912652 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.818181818 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264460567743 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10859500215 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810931103571 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182996796905 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451390846281 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.