The two charts show the participants and generation in particular country.
The bar graph demonstrate the people who participate in drama, painting, sculpture and language according to gender while pie chart provide information about population according to age group.
Overall, what stand out from the graph is that while the popularity of language activities grew over the period in question, and that painting participant remainly high throughput the number of drama intrusted in fell sharply. Old people figure, mean while saw an increase and adult followed by drop.
With regard to drama and language, the women figure were roughly identical at 10 and 20 participants respectively. However, whereas men climbed to reach at 20 in drama before levelling off for the remainder of the period, the sclupture peaked at 10 men and women drop the 5 in the figure.
Turning to the generation, population stayed consistent with old generation figure remaining between 42 percent throughout the period as popularity was nearly as high as children in the first half of decade studied, with number of population rising from 5 percent to 42 percent, but time to time saw under 20 number crash to adult number, a figure which had not changed by last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | Vivi_peach | view | |
| 2021-06-30 | TrangPhuong | view | |
| 2020-06-10 | cindycornelia98 | view | |
| 2020-06-02 | gisellanathania | 85 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | hunanmail | 73 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 73
- The table below shows how many students of a school in the UK chose to take part in four different sports between 2001 and 2011 89
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results. While others believe that it is a more important to reward students who show improvement. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The two charts show the participants and generation in particular country. 11
- The Brick Manufacturing Process 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: MEAN_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meanwhile'?
Suggestion: meanwhile
...ted in fell sharply. Old people figure, mean while saw an increase and adult followed by d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, whereas, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07772020725 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74907456014 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621761658031 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.513535449 43.030603864 229% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 163.333333333 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0683418943553 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341657769142 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304751710464 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0426393241277 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252752353906 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.