You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words
As we can see, the above line graph describes about average passengers using subway stations in London on a 1-hour basis. The units are measured in numbers.
In general, from line graph number of passengers using underground station roses, in the morning hours between 6 am to 8 am via declines after 2 hours. Nearly reaching afternoon, people's using station fluctuates from 10 am to 4 pm. Finally, when it comes to peak hours it dramatically surges meanwhile: it again fluctuates in the middle of 8 pm to 10 pm.
Beginning with, morning hours from 6 am we can see gradual incline of 100 passengers as well as an addition of 200 passengers after an hour later. However, after 2 hours it rapidly decreases 100 Peoples per hour, it continues until 10 am. Finally, when reaching upon mid-noon it fluctuates from 80 to 100, and it continues until 4 pm.
On the other hand, from the line graph we can see, in peak hours it again starts to jump from 4 pm to 9 pm but the number of passengers is same as morning hours. It is fastly plungged after 2-hours. finally, it alters between the time of 8 pm to 10 pm.
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
- The dangers of smoking are well known, yet many people continue with this habit.What are the causes of this? How can we reduce smoking in society?Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 56
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)2005P 73
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)2005P 73
- Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as morning hours. It is fastly plungged after 2-hours. finally, it alters betwee...
^^
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
.... It is fastly plungged after 2-hours. finally, it alters between the time of 8 pm to ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, well, while, in general, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45812807882 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59538133439 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497536945813 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1012645785 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2727272727 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0685432581869 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298551473992 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409307335304 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0567158953832 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327279287495 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.