The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous?
It is true that the Internet creates the users favorable conditions to work and study online. While I accept that this trend are advantageous in some ways, it is my personal perspective that the disadvantageous are more highlighted.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why workers and students have a tendency of working online. In the first place, employees and organizations could save a great deal of time and budget when working via the Internet. Indeed, while staffs are free from commuting time and traffic congestion to work places, it is not necessary for employers to rent a large office. Secondly, the progress of narrowing the education gaps between areas is more feasible thanks to Internet devices. In some unhealthy countries with backward education systems, on the ground of being equiped the Internet, students are given the easier accesses to approach to advanced education programs from healthy nations. Let ‘s take Vietnam as a stark example, had it not been for Internet connection, numerous Vietnamese students would have never kept up with MBA courses of well known universities like Harvard Business School.
On the other hand, I believe that the option of working or studying at home is unbeneficial in some ways. Initially, it creates fewer opportunities for people to build up a strong relationship. If the staffs less face-to-face communicate with their co-workers, hardly can they understand their team-mates. This is conducive to the deterioration in team spirit, resulting productivity reduction. Further and even more significantly, online study may cause some serious health problems. Some learners witness eye-diseases as after several hours keeping the eyes glued on the screens. Besides, it is waves from computers and IT devices taking responsibility for causing headaches or heart attacked to searchers.
In conclusion, although distance working and studying have bright sights to users in their own ways, it seems to me that it’s drawbacks are more outweighed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-06 | Dongz Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | Dongz Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | Dongz Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | Dongz Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | Dongz Nguyen | 84 | view |
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 78
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Fossil fuels (Coal, oil and natural gas) are the main source in many countries. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind or solar energy) are encouraged. Do you think that it is positive or negative development? 78
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 78
- The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, it is true, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37304075235 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98399012888 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626959247649 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.536052519 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.125 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115474606522 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374455859595 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318488213105 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691669886274 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0109173937003 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.