The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
The given charts illustrate the comparison between the percentage of water usage for three main purposes, namely industry, agriculture and domestic in six specific regions of the world.
Overall, out of six examined regions, the water consumption for cultivation accounted for the highest proportions, except North America and Europe where the rates of those for manufacture were largest. Additionally, North America and Europe also witnessed big gaps in industrial and agricultural figures in comparison with other regions.
Regarding water usage for agricultural purposes, these figures which occupied more than four-fifths were the only significant majority in Central Asia, South East Asia and Africa, followed by 71% in South America. By contrast, these figures in developed regions such as North America and Europe which were just 39% and 32% respectively were overtaken by the figures for industrial water used.
According to the charts, the rates of water usage for personal household using accounting for lower than 20% in all shown regions were the smallest in North America, Europe and South East Asia. Furthermore, while the proportions of water usage for industrial purposes in North America and Europe were the largest, at about a half, those in other regions were just around 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Fedkin | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Fedkin | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 61 | view |
- Hellooooo 11
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 78
- Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The chart shows unemployment rate and the number of people leaving Ireland from 1988 to 2008 72
- Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, regarding, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50248756219 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75115831199 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542288557214 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 22.8580356968 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 158.0 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197064016385 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105991521959 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740049840082 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14227273246 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638738355579 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 61.2550243902 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.