Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagre ?
There is an argument that Success is just depended to question of luck and hard working is absolutely useless. However, in my opinion, i completely disagree with this one.
Industrious person will gain the success, and it was proved by the time of history. Taking Thomas Edison for example. T.Edison was the famous inventor in the word at that moment after a thousand of failures. He had the fulfill dream to event the bulb. After 9999 failures, he successfully created this one. Or Taking 7-up for instance. What is the original meaning of a number “ 7 “?The authority of this company is determined. Before reaching the achievement, 7 up faced lot of difficult, and they failed 6 times. However, Thanks to their working hard and never giving up, they had the attainment.
On the other hand, luck is a small factor contributing to success. Firstly People can’t depend on luck if they want to have an achievement. If u don’t prepare for your exam or your presentation, you can’t hope that the question of luck will appear and help you to pass these ones. Secondly, Lucky just only contributes to short term fortune. Taking lottery for example. A person winning the prize is totally depend on lucky and the second time won’t appear meant he or she cannot win this lottery for the rest of their life.
In conclusion, for the reasons i have mentioned above, i can purely confirm that success just come to industrious and determined person. There is not the achievement depend on question of luck and absolutely a person can success with this luck.
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagre ? 61
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagre ? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Edison
...ry. Taking Thomas Edison for example. T.Edison was the famous inventor in the word at ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nt after a thousand of failures. He had the fulfill dream to event the bulb. After 9999 fai...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 393, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...nal meaning of a number ' 7 '?The authority of this company is determined...
^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'these' instead.
Suggestion: these
...f luck will appear and help you to pass these ones. Secondly, Lucky just only contributes ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
.... A person winning the prize is totally depend on lucky and the second time won't...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...for the reasons i have mentioned above, i can purely confirm that success just co...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86988847584 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71038646201 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57249070632 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8362853295 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.9473684211 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1578947368 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110502994774 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312686200715 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484148643324 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737931844632 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300986554816 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.37 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.