The dangers of smoking are well known, yet many people continue with this habit.
What are the causes of this? How can we reduce smoking in society?
Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Although non-profit organization are raising awareness that smoking could have harmful effect on one’s body, and people already realized “What damage it does”, but still many of them continue to smoke. In my opinion, Educating people about the health benefits of smoke free life can have positive result.
Since most of the people know about smoking, and have negative effects on internal organs. Meanwhile, People ‘who are smoking’ on a daily basis suffer from many health issues such as: Lung cancer, Damage to internal organs and Neurological problems. Regular smoking can also reduce one’s life span, and mostly suffering from lung cancer. Meanwhile, Air exhaled after smoking can be inhaled by non-smokers, which would also cause health issues to other people.
Secondly, Government needs to enforce regulations on smoking, and raise more awareness For example: campaign, Educating people about damage it does to organs. Moreover, abandoning smoke will aid one’s well-being. Whereas, Advertising is also another form of communication to people. If Government refuses to take responsibility, that could have catastrophic effects on people life. Many Individuals are afraid to quit smoking, because of increase of weight but it’s incorrect for instance: Quitting smoke only leads to decline in weight. Finally, raising awareness is the crucial part for smoke free life.
In conclusion, although many of the people are aware about effects of smoke. Some people are still habituated. It can only be Reduced with help of Government as well as peoples own awareness.
- The dangers of smoking are well known yet many people continue with this habit What are the causes of this How can we reduce smoking in society Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 63
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)2005P 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled.They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.To what extend do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...nternal organs. Meanwhile, People 'who are smoking' on a daily basis suffer f...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g smoke will aid one's well-being. Whereas, Advertising is also another form of co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60245901639 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81085102755 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594262295082 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9024935561 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207998899236 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796799125445 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453973222173 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151057948249 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336116800183 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.