Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend to take?
The controversial topic with respect to submit assignment later never fails to attract public attention. There has been a heated debate on whether universities should deduct marks from the students' assignment if given in late. As far as I am concerned, I tend to be the advocate regarding this issue.
It is evidently reasonable for me to believe the fact that universities should show the importance of submitting assignments on time to students, due to the fact that they need to know the importance of punctuality. This is because, students are required to hand in assignments on time, which shows that they are capable to complete their tasks in a given time. To illustrate this, students will be rewarded if they finish an assignment earlier can be a convincing example. As a result, deduction of marks should be used by universities as a strategy.
In contrast, it is commonly believed as a fact that there may be too much pressure on students who have to finish assignments in a short period. Nevertheless, this argument does no hold water. It should be pointed out that students need to take full responsibility for their behavior, and they should be punished if they fail to submit an assignment on the due date. That is to say, students need to learn time management skills during their university education, therefore, they will be able to deal with all issues in their future career.
In a nutshell, due to the above-mentioned reasons, we may safely reach the conclusion that universities should make a deduction on students' marks if they submit the assignment after the due date. Despite the fact that it might be difficult for some students, there is no denying the fact that punctuality is very vital to students, and they should know how to manage their time effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | jsrc | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | Daniel Torres | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | hemsingh81 | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | Cheyi1127 | 77 | view |
- Which one is better, Textbook library or new digital material in university. The role of a library in keeping books is obsolete. So universities should use digital media. What is your opinion? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages. 85
- Some people point that experiential learning i e learning by doing it can work well in formal education However others think a traditional form of teaching is the best Do you think experiential learning is beneficial in high schools or colleges 78
- The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is the problem. What problems will this shortage of time causes? 80
- As cities expanding some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population What s your opinion Give some examples or experien 90
- With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only procure digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...iversities should deduct marks from the students assignment if given in late. As far as ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to time'
Suggestion: to time
... That is to say, students need to learn time management skills during their universi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, in contrast, as a result, with respect to, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 6.10837438424 262% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 20.9802955665 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 304.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91118421053 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94578016123 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5453103895 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.846153846 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134227403787 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619381482007 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722681460404 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996941140948 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299668294837 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.