The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The three pie charts compare the expenditure of various sectors of a school in UK in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
It is apparent from the information supplied that the highest percentage of spending was used for teachers’ salaries while the insurance was considered costing the least despite showing an increase over the period.
As can be seen from the given charts, the great portion of expenditure was allocated to teachers’ salaries accounting for approximately a half of total school spending among the given years.
Sharing the same proportion at 15% in 1981, the payment for furniture and equipment and resources had two different change which were upward and downward trend respectively in the two following year. A dramatically decrease took place in the spending of furniture and equipment standing at 5%, and then significantly rose to 23% in 2001. Whereas the money used for resources dropped from 20% in 1991 to 9% in 2001.
Finally, the money that was paid for workers declined nearly a half to 15% in 2001 while the insurance expense showed an increase of 4 times in 2001 compared to its in 1981.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. Agree or disagree? 11
- In many schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts subjects and boys choose science subjectsWhat do you think are the reasons?Do you think that this tendency should be changed? 61
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars? 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls provided into three categories from 1995 2000 89
- The graph shows the amount of junk food in Uk 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...respectively in the two following year. A dramatically decrease took place in the spending of furniture...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03743315508 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87749235486 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577540106952 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2362070192 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.571428571 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259255637293 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130518176975 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132659458146 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160720594147 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147727468388 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.