The figures demonstrate the global water proportion utilized in three sectors per km3 over the course of a one hundred year and various data in this regard in two nations.
The figures demonstrate the global water proportion utilized in three sectors per km3 over the course of a one hundred year and various data in this regard in two nations.
Overall, as can be seen, the water consumption climbed up progressively irrespective of different usage and the highest amount is employed for irrigation regardless of country.
The line graph clearly illustrates that the gap among different areas has widened at the end of the period reaching from roughly 500 km3 in 1900 to approximately 2000 km3 in 2000. Besides, all the counterparts had been following the same pattern by 2000, however, agricultural usage faced a higher increment compared with industrial and domestic use constituting 900 and 400 km3 in 2000 respectively. Moving to the table, Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo which has the highest and the lowest population respectively consumed far higher 395 m3 and far lower 8 m3 water per person. Similarly, more water is used for irrigation in Brazil compared with Congo.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-30 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 89 | view |
- The pie charts compare the proportion of monthly household income allocated for different things in low income and high-income members of a European nation. 89
- The bar chart compares the volume of rentals and sales of films over the course of a decade in a specific shop. 61
- Healthcare should always be funded by governments and it should always be free for people to use. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this idea? 78
- The bar chart demonstrates the proportion of British individuals donating part of their emolument to benevolent organizations in two different time span. 78
- The bar chart compares the volume of smartphones and landlines per 100 people in seven nations. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... respectively consumed far higher 395 m3 and far lower 8 m3 water per person. Si...
^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed far higher 395 m3 and far lower 8 m3 water per person. Similarly, more water ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1696969697 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94913101394 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684848484848 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.5495978283 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.166666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346587298096 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195738630646 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.359789632672 0.0843802449381 426% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363937723277 0.15604864568 233% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.450057923052 0.0819641961636 549% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.06136585366 128% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.